•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study analyzes the meanings of request and condition in Saudi legal texts from a syntactic and analytical perspective, emphasizing the role of legal drafting in ensuring obligatoriness and precision. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, it examines imperative and prohibitive verbs, obligation expressions like "must" and "shall," and conditional tools such as "if" and "unless" to assess their impact on legal interpretation and application. The research highlights how varying structures influence obligation levels, sometimes allowing multiple interpretations and legal ambiguities. The study comprises an introduction and two sections: one on request forms and another on condition tools. Findings show that some structures indicate strict mandates, while others permit probabilistic meanings. Recommendations include developing a legal drafting guide, using clear mandatory expressions, and conducting comparative studies. This research enhances legal text precision, improving Saudi legislation clarity and reinforcing language’s role in legal justice.

Share

COinS